United States · Enforcement & legal proceedings · Issue #3 · 21/09 – 27/09
CPSC publishes factors for potential criminal-enforcement referrals
A May 2026 Federal Register notice sets out factors CPSC personnel should consider when deciding whether to refer alleged criminal regulatory violations to the Department of Justice.
What the primary source says
The general policy identifies, among other considerations, the harm or risk of harm, whether an offence is strict liability with no state-of-mind requirement, the potential gain to the putative defendant, relevant specialised knowledge or licensing, and available evidence about awareness of unlawfulness and knowledge of the regulation.
The notice says the policy is subject to appropriate exceptions and consistency with law. It also says the policy creates no substantive or procedural right or benefit enforceable against the United States or anyone else. The listed considerations therefore should not be presented as a mechanical test or a guarantee about whether a referral will occur.
Why it matters
The useful distinction
Businesses and counsel can see the considerations the agency has publicly identified, while consumers should understand that a referral decision is only one stage and is not itself a criminal conviction.
This briefing is an independent summary of the evidence sources below. Context-only links are not used as factual authority. It does not establish that a product, organisation or listing is unsafe, unlawful or non-compliant beyond what the evidence reports.